by Clara Berlich

Wie anspruchsvoll muss Fem­i­nis­mus sein? Warum wer­den Bar­bie und Poor Things von der Kri­tik so beson­ders gründlich kri­tisiert? Unsere Autorin find­et, auch leichte Unter­hal­tung darf kein männlich­es Priv­i­leg sein. 

“No sur­face holds. No fig­ure, line, or point remains. No ground sub­sists. But no abyss, either. Depth, for us, is not a chasm. With­out a sol­id crust, there is no precipice. Our depth is the thick­ness of our body, our all touch­ing itself. Where top and bot­tom, inside and out­side, in front and behind, above and below are not sep­a­rat­ed, remote, out of touch. Our all inter­min­gled. With­out breaks or gaps.”

FEATURE

The witch craze wages a war against Lilith, who, born from Adam’s clay, refused to obey the Man. The burn­ings of her kin­dred become great pub­lic spec­ta­cles. Lilith leaves her life to the flames, sac­ri­ficed upon the altar of a fab­ri­cat­ed God. But her truth will be known in the …

Some­thing hap­pened to queer­ness in the 1990s. Not only did we begin to describe more and more forms of non-nor­ma­tive desire and embod­i­ment as “queer” – with the advent of the inter­net, queer com­mu­ni­ties also became digi­tised. Our knowl­edge and our inti­ma­cy is now unthink­able with­out vast transat­lantic cir­cuits and …

FEATURE

The close cor­re­la­tion between the emer­gence of pri­vate prop­er­ty and the oppres­sion of women, as pro­posed by Engels, offers an intrigu­ing the­o­ry for under­stand­ing the devel­op­ment of an ear­ly patri­archy and the pro­gres­sion of the patri­ar­chal sys­tem with­in the his­tor­i­cal con­text of Europe. We are com­pelled to won­der whether essentialism, …

The con­cept of the sea—extending infi­nite­ly every­where all the time—and of the islands—sovereign worlds which nonethe­less affect oth­er such islands—emerges as a world struc­ture which becomes a sanc­tu­ary from sin­gu­lar­i­ty to all crea­tures it carries.

Subscribe to our free newsletter to stay updated on new articles and support our inpendent journalism.*

The Cover Story

by Clara Berlich

Wie anspruchsvoll muss Fem­i­nis­mus sein? Warum wer­den Bar­bie und Poor Things von der Kri­tik so beson­ders gründlich kri­tisiert? Unsere Autorin find­et, auch leichte Unter­hal­tung darf kein männlich­es Priv­i­leg sein. 

April 06, 2024

#FEUILLETON

“No sur­face holds. No fig­ure, line, or point remains. No ground sub­sists. But no abyss, either. Depth, for us, is not a chasm. With­out a sol­id crust, there is no precipice. Our depth is the thick­ness of our body, our all touch­ing itself. Where top and bot­tom, inside and out­side, in front and behind, above and below are not sep­a­rat­ed, remote, out of touch. Our all inter­min­gled. With­out breaks or gaps.”

In this brave new world, one can traverse the skies on wings of their own making. The world, it seems, exists solely within our collective dreams, so foreign, yet so familiar. And as I sit alone in the darkness, surrounded by the hum of neon and the flicker of screens, I understand we’re all just dreaming in isolation. 

The witch craze wages a war against Lilith, who, born from Adam’s clay, refused to obey the Man. The burn­ings of her kin­dred become great pub­lic spec­ta­cles. Lilith leaves her life to the flames, sac­ri­ficed upon the altar of a fab­ri­cat­ed God. But her truth will be known in the …

Some­thing hap­pened to queer­ness in the 1990s. Not only did we begin to describe more and more forms of non-nor­ma­tive desire and embod­i­ment as “queer” – with the advent of the inter­net, queer com­mu­ni­ties also became digi­tised. Our knowl­edge and our inti­ma­cy is now unthink­able with­out vast transat­lantic cir­cuits and …

POPULAR

We fashioned our own truth from melancholy: that Amnesia would cure the grief running through us like water. That love would feel the same, outliving our extinction, even when its coordinates had vanished from the sky. 

Photo: Ilona Panych

The close cor­re­la­tion between the emer­gence of pri­vate prop­er­ty and the oppres­sion of women, as pro­posed by Engels, offers an intrigu­ing the­o­ry for under­stand­ing the devel­op­ment of an ear­ly patri­archy and the pro­gres­sion of the patri­ar­chal sys­tem with­in the his­tor­i­cal con­text of Europe. We are com­pelled to won­der whether essentialism, …

The con­cept of the sea—extending infi­nite­ly every­where all the time—and of the islands—sovereign worlds which nonethe­less affect oth­er such islands—emerges as a world struc­ture which becomes a sanc­tu­ary from sin­gu­lar­i­ty to all crea­tures it carries.

“No surface holds. No figure, line, or point remains. No ground subsists. But no abyss, either. Depth, for us, is not a chasm. Without a solid crust, there is no precipice. Our depth is the thickness of our body, our all touching itself. Where top and bottom, inside and outside, in front and behind, above and below are not separated, remote, out of touch. Our all intermingled. Without breaks or gaps.”

New York/The Guggen­heim: Ein Robot­er in einem Glaskä­fig ver­sucht sich drei Jahre lang am Leben zu erhal­ten. Am Ende sein­er Kraft liegt eine absurde Erkenntnis. 

Wie anspruchsvoll muss Fem­i­nis­mus sein? Warum wer­den Bar­bie und Poor Things von der Kri­tik so beson­ders gründlich kri­tisiert? Unsere Autorin find­et, auch leichte Unter­hal­tung darf kein männlich­es Priv­i­leg sein. 

Some­thing hap­pened to queer­ness in the 1990s. Not only did we begin to describe more and more forms of non-nor­ma­tive desire and embod­i­ment as “queer” – with the advent of the inter­net, queer com­mu­ni­ties also became digi­tised. Our knowl­edge and our inti­ma­cy is now unthink­able with­out vast transat­lantic cir­cuits and …

Nobody inspect­ed the dan­gling Marias… None fret­ted for the 40 dif­fer­ent infant Jesus­es, threat­en­ing to tum­ble with the mama to the floor.

SEND IN YOUR SUBMISSIONS //

Subscribe to our free newsletter to stay updated on new articles and support our inpendent journalism.

Something happened to queerness in the 1990s. Not only did we begin to describe more and more forms of non-normative desire and embodiment as ‘queer’ – with the advent of the internet, queer communities also became digitised. Our knowledge and our intimacy is now unthinkable without vast transatlantic circuits and corporate filters.

POPULAR

New York/The Guggen­heim: Ein Robot­er in einem Glaskä­fig ver­sucht sich drei Jahre lang am Leben zu erhal­ten. Am Ende sein­er Kraft liegt eine absurde Erkenntnis. 

Wie anspruchsvoll muss Fem­i­nis­mus sein? Warum wer­den Bar­bie und Poor Things von der Kri­tik so beson­ders gründlich kri­tisiert? Unsere Autorin find­et, auch leichte Unter­hal­tung darf kein männlich­es Priv­i­leg sein. 

Some­thing hap­pened to queer­ness in the 1990s. Not only did we begin to describe more and more forms of non-nor­ma­tive desire and embod­i­ment as “queer” – with the advent of the inter­net, queer com­mu­ni­ties also became digi­tised. Our knowl­edge and our inti­ma­cy is now unthink­able with­out vast transat­lantic cir­cuits and …

Nobody inspect­ed the dan­gling Marias… None fret­ted for the 40 dif­fer­ent infant Jesus­es, threat­en­ing to tum­ble with the mama to the floor.